Search for PodcastsRegister | Sign In
 

 

McCain v. Obama in the Supreme Court of the United States: A Hypothetical (One Hopes) Episode | Georgetown Law - Podcasts

PodcastDirectory / News and Politics / Law
PodcastDirectory / Regions / XX / Unknown



Georgetown Law - Podcasts

Primary Format:
Law

Also Listed as:

User Tags:

RSS Feed
Website

Visit Methings.com for the most recent listings of:

McCain v. Obama in the Supreme Court of the United States: A Hypothetical (One Hopes)


McCain v. Obama in the Supreme Court of the United States: A Hypothetical (One Hopes)

Play Now -->

DATE : Monday, 20 Oct 2008 10:00 -0500
Entered in Database : 2008-10-20 15:00:00
length : 147879315
Link to the Show / Show Notes

David F. Levi, Dean andProfessor, Duke Law School, and former Chief Judge, United StatesDistrict Court for the Eastern District of California (Chief Justice)

Thomas R. Phillips, Partner, Baker Botts LLP, and retired Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Texas (Associate Justice)

Patricia M. Wald,former Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the D.C.Circuit, and former Judge for the International Criminal Tribunal (Associate Justice)

Glen D. Nager, Partner and Chair of the Issues & Appeals Practice, Jones Day (For petitioners John McCain, et al.)

Walter Dellinger, Partner and Chair of the Appellate Practice, O'Melveny & Myers LLP (For respondents Barack Obama, et al.)

This event is a simulated adjudication of the hypothetical Supreme Court case, McCain v. Obama.The case was created by Edward B. Foley, director of The Ohio StateUniversity's Election Law@Moritz, as an experiment to demonstrate howsuch a dispute can be resolved in a non-partisan manner that producesconfidence in both the courts and the election system.

Under the hypothetical facts of McCain v. Obama,severe weather conditions in Colorado led to an extension of pollingplace hours in Denver, but not the rest of the state. The provisionalballots cast during these extended hours, if they are counted, willdetermine the winner of the presidential election - but whethercounting them would violate the U.S. Constitution is the subject of thecourt case.

To ensure bi-partisanship, the chief justice was mutually selected by the other two justices.

This event is sponsored by the Georgetown Law Supreme Court Institute, The Ohio State University Election Law@Moritz and the AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project.

Media interested in attending should e-mail mediarelations@law.georgetown.edu.


Play in your Iphone

Roku + Netflix = Instant Movies on your TV


Add a Podcast
Remove a Podcast
Search for Podcasts
Podcast Directory
by Country
by Language
by Buzz
by Popularity
by Category
by Tags
by Region
by City
on a Google Map